Out of Africa -> into the outhouse


Around May of 2010, the Out-of-Africa (OoA) hypothesis was decisively refuted. [1] One consequence of the OoA hypothesis poses the complete replacement of Neanderthals in regions, colonized by Homo Sapiens - after their expansion from Africa (100-65Kyr). Any detectable trace of Neanderthal genes, found in current human populations, requires a modification of the theory. The assimilation of Neanderthals into the Homo Sapien population during (or after) the exodus of humans from Africa sharply collides with the OoA hypothesis.

With ground-up bone fragments (about the mass of a pill) extracted from 3 Neanderthal females - whose remains were recovered at the Vindija site in Croatia, more has been learned through genetically sequencing Neanderthals, than by studying them in the fossil record. To science, Neanderthals stretch back to 1856 - when the Feldhofer Grotte yielded the first Neanderthal remains - a skull-cap and some bones.

The bones from the Vindija cave fall within the range of 38-44Kyr. Neanderthal DNA appears to be packed into the human genome randomly, suggesting that it did not confer survival advantages on modern humans. (Update: see the following footnote [2]. ) Interestingly, no evidence for gene flow was found, traveling in the opposite direction - from Homo Sapiens to Neanderthals. This fact might be accounted for - if the interspecific, "love-fest" in Europe occurred between small, invading wavelets of modern humans and a large, settled population of Neanderthals (or between a wave of modern humans whose population-size was expanding and a resident population of Neanderthals whose population-size was contracting). The lack of human genes in the Vindija females' bones could - also - have been a circumstance of their times. Modern humans may not have arrived in their vicinity (present-day Croatia) ~40Kyr ago.

Following the dispersal of Homo Sapiens from Africa, the evidence is that Homo Sapiens and Homo Neanderthalensis interbred. In present-day non-African population groups, a 1-4% contribution of Neanderthal genes has been identified. (Update: In Jul 2013, a new estimate of the Neanderthal contribution puts it at: "3.4 - 7.9" percent.) [3] In the present-day African population, there's an estimated, statistically significant non-zero percent of Neanderthal genes, indicating small, episodic flows of Neanderthals (or back-flows of hybridized humans) from Western Asia into Africa. (There has never been a convincing Neanderthal site unearthed in Africa.)

For decades, tantalizing clues pointing towards assimilation have been advanced, yet nothing compelling came about to cinch the case - until relatively recently. Some calculations ran that it would have taken only one absorption of a Neanderthal individual every other generation into the Homo Sapien population (over a period of about 10Kyr) for Neanderthal genes to become detectable in current human populations.

In 1997, Wolpoff and Caspari identified Neanderthal, non-adaptive traits in Europeans - which cannot easily be reconciled with OoA. Wolpoff's and Caspari's evidence was dismissed or deemed "fragmentary". N.B. Wolpoff's evidence that humans and Neanderthals interbred in Europe was blamed - not the OoA theory - which excludes the possibility of interbreeding. [4] In 2002, Eswaran identified what have been termed "non-bottle neck traits" in humans. [5] According to OoA, the entire human population under-went a constriction after leaving Africa. Its genetic variation was shrunk-down to the aperature of a capillary - which rules-out the possibility of "non-bottle neck traits" being found in human populations. The Human Genome Project, a great scientific achievement, linked no more than 90% of existing human mtDNA and Y haplo-groups to the population that spread out from Africa 100-65Kyr ago, revealing another possible discrepancy between solid, genetic evidence and the OoA hypothesis.

I'll not rehearse anymore older, confounding evidence against OoA here, but suffice it to say that its demise was smelt drifting palpably in the air for some time, and - in retrospect - why it attracted such a long-term, almost fanatical adherence might best be explained that it is an idea, resounding with a politicized knell of "truth". Over time - if possible, when counter-evidence against OoA mounted, its acolytes became more and more "hardened" towards its invincibility. [6]

On the face of it and from the outset (1985), the OoA hypothesis was highly susceptible to refutation. It's a greedy explainer. Plus, the OoA is constructed on top of a universal negation. Under it, no present-living human can trace any of his ancestry to a population other than the one - which radiated from Africa 100-65Kyr ago. Any detectable amount of interbreeding between humans and Neanderthals blows this universal negation to shreds. The analysis of the Vindija bones blew it up. Simply put, OoA cannot countenance evidence of assimilation, surviving intact.

John Hawks expressed it best -

"From now on, we are all multiregionalists trying to explain the out-of-Africa pattern."